We are working on a current project in Central Asia which proves that finance is not always the ultimate driver of a deal.
This project involves a mine in the middle of this particular country. Once we had gotten the specs of the product (being finance guys) we naturally started crunching return calculations.
Payback, IRR, Low, base, high scenarios. Running different debt equity ratios. You know the drill.
Then we turned to how do we get the commodity from the mine to a buyer?
OK, no problem. We send the stuff by rail.
“But” one of us asked “can we get the right type of railroad cars?”
Answer? Hopper cars. Always available?
Sometimes. During times of peak demand even leased cars seem to disappear when local companies need them.
Solution: Well let’s partner up with a local company. High five. Problem solved.
More number crunching ensues. Overlay world economic scenarios on top of project numbers. Still works. Wow look at those IRRs!
Now we are really enthusiastic.
Back to transportation. Railroad. Railroad cars. Local partner protects our interests. Product arrives at port. All problems solved…not quite.
What we had failed to realize is that the commodity we were loading at the port needed a deep harbor. A really deep harbor.This particular harbor was deep in only one respect…it had mud. Lots of it…and close to the surface of the water. In other words it was too shallow for our project.
My lesson learned…in a contest between Excel and mud…bet on the mud. Now we have brought in logistic partners. We will see if we can get a big ship (technical term) to be fed by shallow draft tenders from the shore and if we can get our project unstuck. Stay tuned.